Skip to main content

Audit trail

Better Email includes an organization-level audit trail so teams can review important changes across the platform.

note

Enterprise-only feature: Audit Trail is available on Enterprise plans.

What the audit trail is for​

The audit trail helps teams answer questions like:

  • who changed this setting?
  • when was this design system or integration updated?
  • who authenticated or reconnected an integration?
  • when did an export happen?
  • which users or memberships changed?

This is useful for governance, security reviews, handoffs between teams, and debugging workflow issues.

What gets recorded​

The exact event set can evolve, but the audit trail is designed to cover the most important organization activity, including:

  • authentication events
  • membership and user-management changes
  • design system version activity
  • integration changes
  • exports
  • settings updates

Each event is stored with structured metadata so teams can inspect both the human-readable summary and the underlying details.

Browsing audit events​

In the Audit Trail view, teams can filter events by:

  • category
  • target type
  • actor
  • date range
  • text search

This makes it easier to narrow a large event stream down to the change you actually need to investigate.

Audit trail with filters and recent group, campaign, folder, and authentication events

Event details​

Each audit event includes a detail view with context such as:

  • the action that happened
  • when it happened
  • who performed it
  • which targets were affected
  • structured metadata
  • request context
  • raw payload data

This makes the audit trail useful both for everyday troubleshooting and for more formal reviews.

Best practices​

  • Use the audit trail as the source of truth when reconstructing who changed what.
  • Check audit events early when debugging permission or export issues.
  • Filter by actor and date range first when investigating operational incidents.
  • Review export-related events when a team thinks "nothing changed" but the ESP output differs.